🎮 Learning games and sites · 🔭 Science, nature and the world
Foldit
By University of Washington Center for Game Science and partners. Visit Foldit
Desk research from the maker's own pages. Not yet tried by us. Checked 2026-10-24.
A free puzzle game, now 18 years old, in which players fold and design proteins on screen to help real biochemistry research. Players twist chains of amino acids into shapes that score well, compete on puzzle leaderboards, join teams and share scripts called recipes. An Education Mode teaches protein basics for classes. Player discoveries have been published in Nature with players credited. It is a desktop download and is quite hard for young children.
Our take: A rewarding challenge for science-minded teens and biology classes; younger kids will likely find it too hard, and parents should note the public chat.
| Ages it suits | about 12 and up (terms allow 7+) |
|---|---|
| What its terms say about age | You must be 7 or older. Under-18s need a parent or guardian to read, explain and agree to the terms, since play is part of a research study. (terms) |
| Price | Free. Free and not-for-profit (Oct 2026). |
| Works on | Windows, Mac |
| Account | The child's own account |
| Ads | None |
| In-app purchases | None |
| The AI in it | No AI for players; puzzles test how humans and computers work together on protein problems. |
What's good
- Real science with credited discoveries
- Free with no ads
- Education Mode for biochemistry classes
- Strong puzzle-solving challenge
Watch for
- Public chat and forums with adults
- Gameplay data used for research
- Steep learning curve
- Relies on university servers; a recent outage took it offline
Data and privacy
Gameplay is recorded for research and may be published or shared with scientists; accounts store an email address. Chat and forum posts are public, and public chat may be logged to watch for abuse. Read the privacy policy.
Does it work?
Foldit players' work has been published in peer-reviewed science, including a 2019 Nature paper on player-designed proteins. We found no study on what children learn from it.
In the Big Index
- On the list 16 best science games and simulations for kids
Alternatives to Foldit
Desk researchPaidNo ads
Adafruit Circuit Playground Express
Adafruit Industries · ages about 8+ with adult help
A low-cost, flexible first electronics board for kids 8+ with a helper; kids who want a guided kit may prefer a subscription box.
Desk researchFreeNo ads
Adafruit Learning System
Adafruit Industries · ages about 10 and up with an adult
A top free resource for families building electronics together; kids should not work through it alone.
Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads
Algodoo
Algoryx Simulation AB · ages about 8 and up
A great creative sandbox for curious kids and science classes; parents should supervise use of the public sharing site and forum.
Desk researchFree
Babble Dabble Do
Ana Dziengel · ages about 3-12
Great for families and teachers who want craft projects with a design or science twist; an adult should pick and prep the projects.
Desk researchFree, with paid extras
Birdbuddy (AI bird feeder)
Bird Buddy Inc. · ages family use; kids with a parent's account
A fun family science gadget for bird-curious kids if parents accept the subscription and default model training; skip it if you want an offline camera.
Desk researchFreeNo ads
BirdNET
Cornell K. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics and Chemnitz University of Technology · ages about 9 and up with a parent
A good pick for a curious older child with a parent who is comfortable sharing recordings for science; Merlin is friendlier for beginners.
Where these facts come from
- https://fold.it/
- https://fold.it/legal
- https://fold.it/data_policy
- https://fold.it/about_foldit
- https://fold.it/play
- https://fold.it/community_rules
- https://fold.it/forum/discussion/for-educators
- https://fold.it/forum/news/foldit-is-back-after-a-major-outage-at-uw
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1274-4
Prices, terms and features change. Nobody paid to be listed, nothing here is an affiliate link, and Peabody never rates itself. Where we and the maker disagree, the maker's own pages are the ones to trust.