Skip to the main content
PeabodyMake a free story

💻 Coding · 🎓 Courses and learning platforms

iD Tech

By internalDrive, Inc. (iD Tech). Visit iD Tech

Desk research from the maker's own pages. Not yet tried by us. Checked 2026-10-24.

Paid STEM summer camps and online lessons for ages 7 to 19. Week-long day or overnight camps run at more than 75 university campuses, two-week teen academies give 13-18 year olds a taste of college, and one-on-one private lessons happen over Zoom in 50-plus topics. Kids build video games, Roblox and Minecraft worlds, robots including BattleBots, 3D prints and AI projects, taught by background-checked adult instructors.

Our take: A strong but costly choice for tech-hungry kids whose families can afford camp; read the media release and refund terms before you pay.

The facts
Ages it suits7-19 (camps 7-17, teen academies 13-18)
What its terms say about ageThe terms say programs serve ages 7-19, so younger campers may share space or rooms with 18-19 year olds, who must pass a criminal and sex-offender background check for on-campus programs. Parents register and agree to the terms for the child. (terms)
PricePaid. Week-long day camps about $979-$1,499; teen academies $4,599-$5,299; a $49 trial private lesson (USD, Oct 2026). Deposits and online program fees are non-refundable.
Works onWeb
AccountA parent's account
AdsNone
In-app purchasesNone
The AI in itNo AI in the service itself; AI and machine learning are course topics, including an academy with NVIDIA.

What's good

  • Hands-on projects in many topics kids love
  • Background-checked adult instructors
  • Camps on real university campuses
  • Flexible online one-on-one lessons

Watch for

  • Expensive, and deposits are non-refundable
  • Joining means agreeing to let iD Tech use photos, video and kids' projects in marketing
  • Younger campers may mix or room with 18-19 year olds
  • Kids can be dismissed without refund

Data and privacy

The privacy policy says iD Tech aims to comply with COPPA, asks a parent to finish registration for under-13s, and does not sell student information; it uses Google and other ad partners' cookies to target its own ads across the web. Read the privacy policy.

Does it work?

No independent study found; the maker cites 750,000 alumni and a 4.3-star Trustpilot rating.

In the Big Index

Alternatives to iD Tech

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    7 Billion Humans

    Tomorrow Corporation · ages about 10 and up

    A great buy for puzzle-loving kids 10 and up who are ready to think like a programmer; younger children will do better with block-based coding games.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Adafruit Circuit Playground Express

    Adafruit Industries · ages about 8+ with adult help

    A low-cost, flexible first electronics board for kids 8+ with a helper; kids who want a guided kit may prefer a subscription box.

  • Desk researchFreeNo ads

    Adafruit Learning System

    Adafruit Industries · ages about 10 and up with an adult

    A top free resource for families building electronics together; kids should not work through it alone.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Arduino Education

    Arduino S.r.l. (owned by Qualcomm) · ages about 7-18+ (varies by kit)

    A strong choice for schools and teens serious about electronics; younger kids or tight budgets may start with a micro:bit or Circuit Playground.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Arduino UNO Q

    Arduino · ages about 13 and up with some coding experience

    A good next step for teens who already know Arduino and want to add AI vision; true beginners should start with a classic UNO or a starter kit.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    BBC micro:bit

    Micro:bit Educational Foundation · ages about 8-14

    One of the best-value ways for 8- to 14-year-olds to learn coding and simple machine learning, with privacy-first tools; very young children will need help.

Every product in coding →

Where these facts come from

Prices, terms and features change. Nobody paid to be listed, nothing here is an affiliate link, and Peabody never rates itself. Where we and the maker disagree, the maker's own pages are the ones to trust.