Skip to the main content
PeabodyMake a free story

🧑‍🏫 AI tutors and tutoring · 📝 Study and homework tools · 🎓 Courses and learning platforms

PW (Physics Wallah)

By PhysicsWallah Private Limited. Visit PW (Physics Wallah)

Desk research from the maker's own pages. Not yet tried by us. Checked 2026-10-24.

India's PhysicsWallah, which grew from teacher Alakh Pandey's YouTube channel, sells live and recorded classes, notes, practice problems and mock tests for the JEE and NEET entrance exams, school boards from class 6 to 12, and many other exams. Batches run live classes, often two a day, six days a week. PW also runs CuriousJr for grades 1-8, offline centers in 175+ cities, and Pi, a subscription to all recorded PW lectures.

Our take: A low-cost choice for Indian teens preparing for JEE, NEET or boards; parents should read the advertising clause and watch the workload.

The facts
Ages it suitsabout 11-18 (classes 6-12), plus adults
What its terms say about ageNo minimum age is stated. The terms say that for minors, consent to keep their data is deemed given by their parents or guardians. (terms)
PriceFree, with paid extras. Batches are priced per course (not shown on the pages read); Pi lists Rs 499 a month with frequent discounts (INR, Oct 2026); many lectures are free on YouTube.
Works onWeb, iPhone and iPad, Android
AccountThe child's own account
AdsNot stated
In-app purchasesYes
The AI in it'Ask AI' answers students' doubts around the clock during lectures and in batches and Pi, and 'AI Guru' explains passages in PW's digital books.

What's good

  • Low prices for Indian exam prep
  • Live and recorded classes with notes and tests
  • Round-the-clock doubt help
  • Lots of free content

Watch for

  • Terms allow a student's photo, voice and rank in ads
  • Heavy exam-prep schedules
  • Upselling across many batches and products
  • No children's privacy section

Data and privacy

PW collects names, contact details, school details and browsing data, uses it for promotions, and shares it with service providers including marketing and advertising firms. Its terms let PW use a user's name, age, photo, videos, voice recordings and exam rank in advertising; there is no children's section and no word on AI training. Read the privacy policy.

Does it work?

The maker's own claims only; no independent study was found.

Alternatives to PW (Physics Wallah)

  • Desk researchFreeNo ads

    AmblesideOnline

    AmblesideOnline (volunteer advisory) · ages about 5-18 (Year 0 to Year 12)

    A strong free plan for homeschool families drawn to Charlotte Mason and literature-rich learning; secular families or those wanting an interactive program should look elsewhere.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    AoPS Online

    Art of Problem Solving (AoPS Incorporated) · ages grades 5-12 (about 10-18)

    A strong fit for a child who loves hard math and wants contest prep; a child who is behind in math needs something gentler.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Babbel

    Babbel · ages about 13+ (built for adults)

    A solid choice for a motivated older teen; younger kids are not allowed and are better served by kids' apps.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Beast Academy

    Art of Problem Solving (AoPS) · ages 6-13 (levels 1-5, roughly grades 1-5)

    A great fit for curious or advanced elementary kids and homeschoolers who enjoy a challenge; kids who need gentle catch-up practice should start elsewhere.

  • Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads

    Codecademy

    Codecademy LLC · ages 16+

    A good next step for a motivated 16- or 17-year-old; younger kids need a coding tool built for them.

  • Desk researchFreeNo ads

    Connections Academy

    Pearson · ages grades K-12

    Worth a look for families who need school at home and have an adult free to coach; families expecting it to match a good local school should read the research first.

Every product in ai tutors and tutoring →

Where these facts come from

Prices, terms and features change. Nobody paid to be listed, nothing here is an affiliate link, and Peabody never rates itself. Where we and the maker disagree, the maker's own pages are the ones to trust.