Skip to the main content
PeabodyMake a free story

🗣️ Language learning · 🎮 Learning games and sites

Duolingo

By Duolingo, Inc.. Visit Duolingo

Desk research from the maker's own pages. Not yet tried by us. Checked 2026-10-24.

Duolingo is a free app for learning more than 40 languages, plus chess, through short game-like lessons. Learners tap, type and speak answers, keep daily streaks, and compete in weekly leagues. The free version has ads; Super Duolingo removes them, and the Max tier adds AI features such as spoken video calls. Children under 13 get a restricted version with fewer social features.

Our take: A fine free habit-builder for tweens and teens learning a language; younger kids are better served by Duolingo ABC or a kids' app.

The facts
Ages it suitsabout 10+ (children under 13 get a restricted mode)
What its terms say about ageNot stated in the terms. The privacy policy lets children under 13 (US) create accounts as Child Users with a username instead of an email, a parent's email collected later, and limited social features. (terms)
PriceFree, with paid extras. Free with ads; Super Duolingo on the US App Store is listed at $9.99 or $12.99 a month and $83.99 to $119.99 a year (Oct 2026). Free trial converts to paid.
Works onWeb, iPhone and iPad, Android
AccountThe child's own account
AdsYes
In-app purchasesYes
The AI in itAI shapes lessons to each learner, and paid AI features such as Video Call hold spoken conversations using outside models like OpenAI and Google.

What's good

  • Free and widely available
  • Short lessons build a daily habit
  • Restricted mode for under-13 users
  • Many languages

Watch for

  • Ads and gem purchases in the free version
  • Streaks and leagues are built to pull kids back
  • Older teens' voice data may train Duolingo's AI
  • Some social features (following, leaderboards) even for kids

Data and privacy

Under-13 users get non-personalized family-safe ads, no third-party tracking, and their speech is not used for product improvement. For older users, Duolingo may record AI-feature audio and use it to train its own AI models, and shares data with ad networks for personalized ads unless switched off. Read the privacy policy.

Does it work?

Duolingo publishes its own efficacy research (for example, that five sections equal five university semesters of French or Spanish); these studies are done by Duolingo and mostly involve adults.

In the Big Index

Alternatives to Duolingo

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Babbel

    Babbel · ages about 13+ (built for adults)

    A solid choice for a motivated older teen; younger kids are not allowed and are better served by kids' apps.

  • Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads

    Buddy.ai

    Buddy.ai · ages about 3-8

    Engaging speaking practice for preschoolers learning English; privacy-minded parents should skip the recording consent or delete data regularly.

  • Desk researchFree, with paid extras

    Busuu

    Busuu Limited (owned by Chegg, Inc.) · ages 13+

    A fair choice for a teen studying a language who wants speaking practice; younger kids need a different app.

  • Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads

    Cambly Kids

    Cambly Inc. · ages about 4-15

    Helpful for children learning English as a new language who need speaking practice; parents should sit in on early calls and read the recording terms.

  • Desk researchFreeNo ads

    Google Translate Practice

    Google · ages teens and adults; younger kids with a parent

    Worth a try for teens learning Spanish or French who want speaking practice; younger kids and families wanting a full course should pick a dedicated app.

  • Desk researchPaidNo ads

    Gus on the Go

    toojuice, LLC · ages about 2-8

    A cheap, gentle first taste of a new or heritage language for little kids; not enough on its own to build real fluency.

Every product in language learning →

Where these facts come from

Prices, terms and features change. Nobody paid to be listed, nothing here is an affiliate link, and Peabody never rates itself. Where we and the maker disagree, the maker's own pages are the ones to trust.