🧑🏫 AI tutors and tutoring · ➗ Math apps and platforms · 🧸 Early learning (ages 2-6)
Synthesis Tutor
By Synthesis School, Inc.. Visit Synthesis Tutor
Desk research from the maker's own pages. Not yet tried by us. Checked 2026-10-24.
Synthesis Tutor is an AI math tutor for children 5 to 11. A child works through spoken and on-screen lessons with digital blocks and puzzles while the tutor adjusts to how they answer. Parents set up the account and get progress reports; the company sells it as hands-off for parents. It grew out of Synthesis School, which also runs Synthesis Teams, a group problem-solving program for ages 8 to 14.
Our take: Worth a free trial for curious 5-to-11-year-olds who like math puzzles; families on a budget can get similar practice elsewhere for less.
| Ages it suits | 5-11 |
|---|---|
| What its terms say about age | Only adults 18+ may sign up; the child must be 5 to 11 for Tutor (8 to 14 for Teams). Parents give consent under COPPA by email verification and click-through. (terms) |
| Price | Paid. 7-day free trial. The page showed several price sets in Oct 2026: about $29 a month or $119 a year for up to 7 kids, or $35-45 a month for one child, and a family plan at $70 a month, $400 a year or $1,499 lifetime |
| Works on | Web |
| Account | A parent's account |
| Ads | None |
| In-app purchases | None |
| The AI in it | An adaptive AI tutor talks the child through math lessons and changes the next step based on their answers. |
What's good
- Built for young children, not adapted from an adult chatbot
- Parent-only sign-up with COPPA consent
- Hands-on, visual math
- Progress reports
Watch for
- Pricey, and prices on the page conflict
- No independent evidence
- Subscription with arbitration terms
- Web screen time
Data and privacy
Synthesis says it collects only the child's first name or nickname and age or grade from the parent, plus learning data such as answers, time spent and progress, and needs parent consent for under-13s. Its COPPA policy does not say whether children's data trains AI models. Read the privacy policy.
Does it work?
The maker's own claims only: it promises immediate results and cites tens of thousands of families (the page says both 25,000 and 35,000). No independent study was found.
In the Big Index
Alternatives to Synthesis Tutor
Desk researchPaidNo ads
ALEKS
McGraw Hill (ALEKS Corporation) · ages school-age students through college (K-12 and higher ed courses)
A rigorous, mastery-based option for motivated older students or homeschoolers; younger or easily bored kids may prefer something more playful.
Desk researchFree, with paid extras
Brainly
Brainly · ages grades 7-12
May suit teens who want structured homework practice and parents who want a human in the loop; ad tracking and public posting are drawbacks for younger children.
Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads
Brilliant
Brilliant Worldwide, Inc. · ages about 10-18 and adults (grade 5 to college)
A strong pick for motivated middle and high schoolers who like puzzles, if the price fits; younger kids and families wanting free tools should look elsewhere.
Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads
Buddy.ai
Buddy.ai · ages about 3-8
Engaging speaking practice for preschoolers learning English; privacy-minded parents should skip the recording consent or delete data regularly.
Desk researchFree, with paid extrasNo ads
Cambly Kids
Cambly Inc. · ages about 4-15
Helpful for children learning English as a new language who need speaking practice; parents should sit in on early calls and read the recording terms.
Desk researchPaidNo ads
CENTURY
CENTURY-TECH Limited (UK) · ages about 6-16 (KS1 to GCSE), plus post-16
A sensible home or school add-on for UK families; families outside the UK curriculum will find less fit.
Where these facts come from
- https://www.synthesis.com/tutor
- https://www.synthesis.com/terms
- https://www.synthesis.com/privacy
- https://www.synthesis.com/coppa
Prices, terms and features change. Nobody paid to be listed, nothing here is an affiliate link, and Peabody never rates itself. Where we and the maker disagree, the maker's own pages are the ones to trust.